OWINGS MILLS, Md. -- Baltimore Ravens wide receiver Steve Smith Sr. has passed his physical and will be activated off the physically unable to perform list.Smith, who tore his Achilles nine months ago, will likely return to practice on Monday. The Ravens are not expected to play Smith in the preseason.Smith tweeted about his return:?Smith, 37, the oldest receiver in the NFL, decided to delay retirement for a year after suffering a season-ending injury midway through the 2015 season.He currently ranks No. 11 on the NFLs all-time receiving list with 13,392 yards, and he could finish in the top five if he exceeds 1,195 yards in 2016. In his two seasons with the Ravens, Smith has caught 125 passes for 1,735 yards receiving and nine touchdowns. Clearance Jordans China . PETERSBURG, Fla. Cheap Air Jordan 3 Shoes . The third-ranked Ivanovic, who won the event in 2008 and 10, served five aces and broke Wickmayer, also a former winner in 2009, five times. "The result looked easier than it really was," Ivanovic said. http://www.discountairjordan3.com/ . Brad Jacobs and his Sault Ste. Marie, Ont., team took control of the game early. Cheap Air Jordan 3 Retro . And follow TSN.ca right through Deadline Day for all the updates. From Pierre LeBrun While Anaheim GM Bob Murray said earlier this season he was not going to trade Jonas Hiller despite the fact hes an unrestricted free agent on July 1, some sources have told TSN Hockey Insider Pierre LeBrun that Murray might be willing to move another goalie. Cheap Jordans Outlet . Houston won 3-0 to advance to face New York in the Eastern Conference semifinals. Last in the game, Di Vaio and Romero got into a shoving match with several Houston players. Romero appeared to elbow and kick Houston defender Kofi Sarkodie. Williams technical director Pat Symonds says he is not aware of a loophole in next years regulations that is capable of giving a team an advantage similar to the one Brawn GP had in 2009.Brawn GP managed to win the title in its single year of competition, despite limited testing and a modest budget compared to its rivals. The team gained a significant advantage by interpreting the rules around the rear of the car differently to allow for a double-decked diffuser producing more rear downforce. Only Toyota and Williams did the same, but came up with less effective solutions.Although several other teams were aware of the loophole that allowed the double diffuser, they opted to take a literal interpretation of the regulations and started the season with a single-deck diffuser. When the FIA conceded that the double diffuser was allowed under the regulations, all teams came up with their own versions -- albeit retrofitted to their original designs.With wider tyres, wider cars and new dimensions for the diffuser, front wing and rear wing, 2017 presents a bigger overhaul of the regulations than the 2009 changes, but Symonds says he is not aware of a loophole with the same potential as the double diffuser.2009 was slightly different, he said. There was a huge discrepancy between the teams but largely because there was a somewhat twisted use of semantics to interpret a regulation that made a fantastic difference.Now that may happen again -- if it does, were in trouble because we havent seen it -- but if everything is equal, and were all interpreting the rules in a similar way, then okay, thats one thing. 2009 was different because there was this interpretation [around the double diffuser] and at Renault we asked the question could we do this and we were told no.dddddddddddd Later it transpired the FIA said we asked the question in the wrong way -- Ive never quite understood it -- but yeah, we missed it and it was hard to get back.It was quite interesting, those of us who didnt have the double diffuser, we had half our crew in Paris arguing against it and the other half busily designing it! The week after the court of appeal, we were in China with a double diffuser. We didnt start the development after the court of the appeal, we started that a long while before.Symonds said trying to find a different interpretation of the rules has become a key part of modern Formula One car design.Thats something that is part of our jobs and I think some teams are very aggressive at it and very good at it, more so, for example, that we are at Williams. We seem to be working flat-out just doing what we need to do, but I know that other teams do have people with that fundamental job -- to look at everyone elses cars and see what they can see thats wrong with them and then look at the rules over and over again to see how you can exploit them.But when I say exploit, I dont mean cheat or anything like that, I mean just making sure that, coming back to semantics [of the rules], they think I know thats what he [the rule maker] meant, but whats he said?. Thats what it comes down to, and quite often they are not the same thing. ' ' '