Poll: Should the Ravens keep Robert Griffin III on the 53-man roster

Back in early April Mark Andrews Jersey Sale , the Baltimore Ravens signed Robert Griffin III. I ran a poll on that day asking you, the readers of Baltimore Beatdown, if you liked or disliked the signing. Most fans either liked the signing or felt indifferent.Instant Reaction: Ravens sign Robert Griffin IIINow, earlier today, the Ravens decided not to play Robert Griffin III against the Washington Redskins.There has been a report indicating multiple teams are interested in the former second overall pick. There’s also speculation the Ravens are keeping him on the final 53-man roster. So, what a better way to decide than the readers of Baltimore Beatdown voting on the issue?Reasons for keeping RGIIIThe Ravens don’t want Lamar Jackson on the field for 2018. They know he is a work-in-progress, even with his impressive skill-set and flash. He’s the future and if Joe Flacco suffers an injury they don’t want the rookie on the field. Griffin III gives them a capable backup spot and another mentor for Jackson to work with. The combination of Flacco, Griffin III and James Urban all coaching, grooming and mentoring the young star will provide areas of expertise spanning the totality of the game. Keeping RGIII sacrifices a depth-player elsewhere, namely wide receiver, defensive line or a fifth tight end, but building towards the future could be worth it in their eyes.— Kyle BarberReasons why the Ravens are better off without RGIIIFirst off, the Ravens have only rostered two quarterbacks for nine consecutive years; it does not make much sense to keep three this year at the expense of depth at another needy position, especially when they have two first rounders in Joe Flacco and Lamar Jackson available. Perhaps the main reason to move on from Griffin is the fact that he is not much better, if better at all, than Jackson currently. Rob has played in only five regular season games since 2014 and only a half against NFL caliber players this preseason. In his outing against real competition, Griffin struggled greatly with accuracy. Strategically, the Ravens are best off with Lamar as their starting quarterback as soon as possible from a salary cap management standpoint. Keeping Griffin only hinders Jackson’s development from a repetitions standpoint both in practice and game action if necessary. The days of first round quarterbacks learning on the sidelines are long gone in the modern NFL, rookie quarterbacks often play early and thrive these days. Ultimately, flipping Griffin for a mid-round draft pick would be a stroke of genius in both the short- and long-term for this franchise. — Vasilis LericosNow, for you to decide. The most successful quarterback in franchise history is set to join a new team this offseason."WhitePodcast Film Review Fanposts Fanshots Ravens StoriesScheduleRosterStatsYahoo Ravens ReportYahoo Ravens Depth ChartYahoo Ravens TransactionsYahoo Ravens PhotosAbout Odds Community Guidelines StubHub ✕Ranking trade candidates for QB Joe FlaccoNew,67commentsThe most successful quarterback in franchise history is set to join a new team this offseason. ESTShareTweetShareShareRanking trade candidates for QB Joe FlaccoTommy Gilligan-USA TODAY SportsAfter much speculation surrounding the quarterback position in Baltimore during the season Replica Mark Andrews Jersey , which resurfaced again briefly in the playoffs, the Ravens have made their intentions clear: Joe Flacco’s days in Charm City are over. When Lamar Jackson seized the starting job midseason after Flacco suffered a hip injury, it quickly became more apparent that Flacco had played his last season with the Ravens. In anointing Jackson as the future following the Ravens playoff defeat to the Chargers, John Harbaugh shut the door on any potential return for Flacco. “Lamar Jackson is our quarterback going forward,” Harbaugh said. “Joe is going to have a market. I’m going to be in Joe’s corner unless we play him.”The key term here is “market”, as it hints that the Ravens will look to trade Flacco rather than simply release him. This was reported earlier in the season by Ian Rapoport, and it makes sense for both parties. Flacco can choose his preferred destinations and the Ravens can retain assets in return for him. Exactly what the market for Flacco looks like is unclear, but there’s reason to believe the Ravens could net a solid haul in exchange for him. Take the Alex Smith trade for example, which occurred last season. The Redskins traded a third-round pick and Kendall Fuller, a talented cornerback, to the Chiefs to acquire Smith. While Smith and Flacco are different players, they’re both veteran quarterbacks with a track record of winning. The fact that Flacco has won a super bowl could make his value even higher than Smith’s was this past offseason, too. In his first press conference as the new general manager last week, Eric DeCosta called the situation with Flacco an “ongoing process” and suggested that looking to move Flacco is not amongst the organization’s top priorities right now. Given the number of free agents on the roster and the need for scouting in the upcoming draft, this shouldn’t come as a surprise. However, the Ravens will clearly begin looking to move Flacco at some point this offseason. Cap space will be a significant deciding factor in any trade discussions involving Flacco. While he’s long been in the conversation amongst the highest-paid quarterbacks in the league, Flacco is only owed $18.5 million next season, which ranks 23rd at the position. With this in mind, where could Flacco end up? Below is a list of teams who could be potential trade partners for the Ravens to deal with, ranked in terms of least likely to most likely. 5) Tampa Bay Buccaneers The Buccaneers appeared like a far more likely destination during the regular season, when they jostled between Jameis Winston and Ryan Fitzpatrick as the starting quarterback. Bruce Arians, Tampa Bay’s new head coach Stitched Mark Andrews Jersey , appears committed to Winston going forward. Winston has done little to improve since entering the league, however, and the Buccaneers have offensive weapons that would compliment Flacco well. Still, Tampa Bay would have to do some cap wiggling to take on Flacco’s contract. There’s an outside shot that the Buccaneers would look to acquire Flacco to challenge Winston in the offseason, but it’s likely more of a longshot than anything. 4) Jacksonville Jaguars The Jaguars took a significant step back in 2018 after making it to the AFC championship game two seasons ago. This was in large part due to poor quarterback play, as Blake Bortles struggled and was replaced by Cody Kessler midseason. Kessler isn’t a long-term solution and the Jaguars appear ready to move on from Bortles after an underwhelming tenure. Flacco would be a logical target for them given their dire need at the position. Jacksonville boasts a championship-caliber defense and solid collection of running backs, two elements Flacco has thrived with in the past. The reason they come in lower on this list is simple: cap space. Jacksonville currently has just over $4 million dollars in cap space, well below the $18.5 million threshold that Flacco’s contract demands. In order to trade for him, Jacksonville would be forced to move several pieces around, many of which would be on defense. They may opt to select a quarterback with the 7th overall pick in the draft, too. 3) Miami DolphinsAfter six years with Ryan Tannehill at quarterback, the Dolphins appear ready to move on this offseason. Tannehill has been hampered by injuries in recent years and Miami, led by new head coach Brian Flores, is looking to get back into the postseason. Could the Dolphins look to pair a rookie head coach with a veteran, experienced signal caller? It’s definitely possible, and Miami would be a solid spot for Flacco to land. Like the Jaguars, the Dolphins could look to draft a quarterback early in April and Flacco would be a veteran presence for him to learn behind. Miami has just over $12 million dollars in cap space, so they would have to shed some salary to cede way for Flacco’s contract. Given their need at the position, however, they’d likely be willing to make the required moves. In order to separate themselves from the Jets and Bills in the AFC East, and even potentially challenge the defending champion Patriots, the Dolphins need a change at quarterback. Flacco could help them become a postseason contender. 2) Denver BroncosThe Broncos are in an interesting spot. Since Peyton Manning retired following the 2015 season Baby Mark Andrews Jersey , their quarterback depth chart has been that of a revolving door. Failed experiments like Trevor Simien and Brock Osweiler ceded way for Case Keenum, who Denver signed to a two-year contract this past offseason. In his first season in Denver, Keenum completed 62.3% of his passes while throwing for 3,890 yards, 18 touchdowns, and 15 interceptions. While these numbers aren’t terrible, Keenum struggled with inconsistency throughout the season. Could Flacco help them end a three-year postseason drought? Flacco’s play style meshes well with the high-altitude, cold weather climate of Denver, and the Broncos have more than enough cap space to take on his contract. Denver has a talented defense and capable offensive weapons like Emmanuel Sanders and Phillip Lindsay. How content they are with Keenum at quarterback is unknown, but if they are looking to move in a different direction, Flacco is a viable option and they represent a capable trade destination. 1) Washington RedskinsAfter trading for Alex Smith last summer and signing him to a 4-year, $94 million dollar contract, not many expected the Redskins to be looking for a quarterback again this offseason. However, Smith suffered a gruesome leg injury midseason and complications during surgery that have his playing status not only up in the air for next year, but for his career going forward. Colt McCoy, the Redskins primary backup, is also recovering from a leg injury. McCoy or Josh Johnson are set to compete for the starting job next season, and Flacco would represent an upgrade over both. Washington can take on his contract and trading for Flacco makes sense for both parties. The Redskins are in dire need of a quarterback and Flacco would not be forced to relocate more than a short move down I-95. The Redskins are reportedly looking to draft a quarterback this year and Flacco would make for a suitable stopgap option while said rookie develops. Baltimore would avoid having to play against Flacco should be traded to Washington, as well. Honorable Mentions: Oakland Raiders, New York Giants